What are the differences between soft law and hard law in international litigation?

Soft law and hard law are two different types of international litigation laws. Soft law is defined as a “general set of standards that are not legally binding”, whereas hard law is legally binding and enforceable in court. Soft law is usually created by non-governmental organizations or other organizations, and are more often used to provide guidance or diplomatic relations between countries. Hard law is created by governments and international treaties, and are legally binding and enforceable. Soft law is often used to prevent major conflict between countries, as well as to improve the quality of governance in different countries. Hard law, on the other hand, is used to set parameters or regulations between countries or organizations. Soft law is used to develop and strengthen relationships between countries, while hard law is used to enforce regulations and sanctions. Hard law is also used to prevent a country from breaking international law or violating the rights of citizens in another country. Soft law is more likely to be ignored by countries than hard law, as it is nonbinding and not legally enforceable. Hard law is legally binding and must be followed, so countries are less likely to ignore it. Overall, soft law and hard law are two different types of international litigation laws. Soft law is used to create and strengthen diplomatic relations, while hard law is used to enforce regulations and punish countries for breaking international law.

Related FAQs

What are the differences between soft law and hard law in international litigation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts