What is a bifurcated trial in an insurance litigation case?

A bifurcated trial in an insurance litigation case is when a court separates out the legal issues from the factual issues. This form of trial allows a court to determine whether the law applies to a case before determining the facts of the case. This form of court procedure was developed in Virginia to allow cases to be decided in a more efficient manner. In a bifurcated trial, a judge will preside over the case and will hear both the legal and factual issues. The court will first hear the legal issues, such as whether the insurance company is bound to provide coverage for the claim. The court will then make a decision on the legal issue and then proceed to hear the facts of the case. This means that the court will hear testimony from witnesses and evaluate evidence to determine whether the insurance company should be held responsible for the claim. The benefit of a bifurcated trial is that it allows the court to quickly decide complex legal issues without having to spend time determining the facts of the case. This form of trial is generally used in insurance litigation cases that involve long and complicated legal claims. It is important to note that a bifurcated trial is not the same as a full trial and will not result in a final decision on the case.

Related FAQs

What is a bifurcated trial in an insurance litigation case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts