What is the difference between diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality?

Diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality are two distinct concepts in International Law in Georgia. Diplomatic immunity is the legal right of foreign diplomats and their staff to be free from the jurisdiction of the host country. Diplomatic immunity recognizes the sovereign equality of states and prevents any state from being held legally accountable for the actions of its diplomats in a foreign land. Extraterritoriality, on the other hand, is the legal recognition by Georgia of the right of an individual or corporation of a foreign country to be free from the jurisdiction of the host country. This in effect allows a foreign state or its citizens to be exempt from the laws and regulations of the host state, including criminal law. In summary, diplomatic immunity protects diplomats and their staff from the jurisdiction of the host country, while extraterritoriality protects foreign citizens and corporations from the jurisdiction of the host country. In both cases, the purpose is to protect the sovereignty of the host country, as well as to protect foreign countries and their citizens from being held accountable in the courts of the host country.

Related FAQs

What is the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)?
What are the international norms on armed conflict?
What is the International Law of the Sea?
How does international law protect the rights of refugees and asylum seekers?
What is the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)?
What is the International Convention against Apartheid in Sports (ICAS)?
What is the Law of the Sea?
What is international economic law?
What is the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)?
How does International Law regulate international trade?

What is the difference between diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts