What is the difference between a boycott and a trade embargo?

A boycott and a trade embargo are both forms of economic sanctions, but they are different in how they are implemented and what they strive to achieve. A boycott is an organized refusal to buy, use, or engage with a particular company or country. It is usually organized by citizens or a group of citizens for a political purpose. For example, many people in the U.S. have decided to boycott companies that use unfair labor practices or engage in environmental destruction. This also applies to countries, and boycotting a country is done in order to put political or economic pressure on them. A trade embargo is a government-imposed restriction on the movement of goods and services between two countries. It is typically issued as a result of a violation of International Trade Law. The goal of an embargo is to deny the targeted country access to the benefits of international trade. Embargos are usually imposed to force a change in the policies of the targeted country, such as an end to human rights abuses. Both boycotts and trade embargos are used to force a change in policy or political situation, but they are implemented in different ways. A boycott is organized and led by people, while a trade embargo is implemented by the government.

Related FAQs

What is the most important legal document governing the global trading system?
What is the role of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in the global economy?
What is the difference between an antidumping duty and a tariff?
What is the World Bank?
What is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)?
What is the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs)?
What is the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs)?
What is the WTO Agreement on Trade in Services?
What is the European Union (EU)?
What is the role of the International Chamber of Commerce in international trade?

What is the difference between a boycott and a trade embargo?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts