What is the difference between juvenile and adult sentencing?

The difference between juvenile and adult sentencing in California lies in the intent behind the law. In California, juvenile sentencing is based on the belief that minors are not as responsible for their actions as adults. This philosophy, called parens patriae, allows the state to intervene to protect and rehabilitate juvenile offenders. As a result, juvenile punishments in California often focus on rehabilitation and accountability, rather than punishment and deterrence. Juveniles typically receive community service, probation, or short-term confinement in a facility. In rare cases, juveniles can be tried as adults, in which case adult sentencing laws would apply. Meanwhile, adult sentences in California are designed with justice and deterrence in mind. Adults may receive probation, fines, imprisonment, or even death in rare cases. Depending on the crime and the defendant’s prior criminal history, penalties can range from a few days in prison to life without parole. Ultimately, the goal of juvenile sentencing is to help the offender learn from their mistakes so that they can become contributing members of society. Adult sentencing, on the other hand, is intended to punish the offender and discourage future criminal activity.

Related FAQs

Are juveniles ever detained for extended periods of time in the juvenile justice system?
Are juveniles ever given a second chance after committing a crime?
What is a juvenile transfer hearing?
How has public opinion on juvenile crime changed over time?
What methods are used to determine guilt in a juvenile delinquency case?
What are the consequences of juvenile crime?
What are the long-term outcomes of juvenile delinquency?
What is an evidence-based approach to juvenile justice?
What is the process for determining if a juvenile should be tried as an adult?
What is a juvenile diversion program?

What is the difference between juvenile and adult sentencing?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts