What is the difference between statutory interpretation and judicial interpretation?

Statutory interpretation and judicial interpretation are two forms of interpreting the law. Statutory interpretation is the act of interpreting laws that have already been enacted by a legislature or governing body. Judges use statutory interpretation when determining cases as the law dictates. Judicial interpretation on the other hand is when judges interpret the law for the purpose of deciding a specific case. This is done by looking at the facts of the case and determining what the applicable law should be. In Maryland, judges interpret the law based on the facts of the case. By analyzing the facts, judges must apply the appropriate law to make a decision. Judges typically refer to statutes and other legal sources, such as court cases, to make sure they are making a valid application of the law. This is known as judicial interpretation. Statutory interpretation in Maryland is a bit different. Legislators draft bills and pass them into law. Statutory interpretation is then used to interpret the meaning of the law. Judges may turn to legislative history or case law to ensure they are interpreting the law accurately. Judicial interpretation is a critical tool for judges in the state of Maryland to apply the law to a specific case. Statutory interpretation helps individuals and businesses to better understand the laws they must abide by in order to stay compliant. Both forms of interpretation play an important role in our legal system.

Related FAQs

How does the study of jurisprudence law differ in different countries?
What is the difference between public and private international law?
What is the role of the jury in jurisprudence law?
What is the best way to stay up to date on jurisprudence law?
What is the difference between civil and administrative law?
What is the role of legal precedent in understanding jurisprudence law?
What is the legal authority of jurisprudence law?
How does jurisprudence law affect the administration of justice?
How does jurisprudence law deal with issues of human rights?
How did legal realism influence jurisprudence law?

What is the difference between statutory interpretation and judicial interpretation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts