What is the difference between recklessness and negligence when it comes to serving alcohol?

When it comes to serving alcohol in California, there is a difference between recklessness and negligence. Recklessness occurs when someone has been grossly negligent in their duties, deliberately disregarding a known risk. Recklessness is a more serious offense related to serving alcohol than negligence, which is failing to take the necessary precautions or act with the appropriate degree of care. For example, if an employee serves alcohol to an underage person, this could qualify as recklessness. This is because the employee was aware of the law and willfully disregarded it, leading to potential harm. On the other hand, if an employee accidentally serves alcohol to an underage person, this would likely be considered negligence. This is because the employee may have acted without due diligence, resulting in harm. Negligence can also come in the form of serving too much alcohol to a patron. If an employee continues to serve drinks to someone who is already visibly intoxicated, this would qualify as negligence. This is because the employee should be aware of the risks associated with over-serving someone and should have acted to prevent the patron from becoming overly intoxicated. In either case, recklessness or negligence, businesses and establishments that serve alcohol can be held responsible for any injuries or damage that occur as a result of serving alcohol. Under California law, any person injured as a result of an establishment’s reckless or negligent serving of alcohol can sue for damages. For these reasons, it is important for business and establishments to take special care when serving alcohol to prevent any instances of recklessness or negligence.

What is the difference between recklessness and negligence when it comes to serving alcohol?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts