What is the difference between libel and slander?

The difference between libel and slander is defined by California law. Libel is when a statement is made in a written form such as in a newspaper, magazine, website, or book that is damaging to a person’s reputation. Slander is when a statement is made orally and communicated to others. In both cases, the statement must be false and defamatory. Libel and slander can both cause damage to a person’s reputation. However, libel has the potential to cause more harm since it is in a permanent medium and can be seen and read by many people. A person can sue for libel as it is seen as a more serious offence than slander. Though the differences between libel and slander are defined by law, the distinction can be difficult to make in some cases. California courts look at a variety of factors to determine whether a statement is considered libel or slander, including the context in which it was made, the medium in which it was published, and the seriousness of the harm caused.

Related FAQs

What is the purpose of the Freedom of Information Act?
What is the role of the internet in media law?
What is the role of the media in promoting democracy?
What is the impact of media law on freedom of the press?
How does media law relate to the Freedom of Information Act?
What are the laws protecting the news media from libel?
How does media law affect the entertainment industry?
What is the role of public broadcasters?
What are the rules for obtaining permission to air copyrighted material?
How is media used to influence political campaigns?

What is the difference between libel and slander?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts