What is the difference between a court martial and a summary court-martial?

In Virginia, military law governs members of the military. An important part of this is the distinction between a court-martial and a summary court-martial. A court-martial is a formal legal proceeding for the trial of military members accused of serious offenses. It is conducted by a panel of officers who decide the accused’s guilt or innocence and the penalty, if any. This type of trial usually involves more complex issues and involves more evidence. A summary court-martial is a much less formal process and can be conducted by one commissioned officer. It deals with lesser offenses and offers a less severe penalty than a court-martial. The officer conducting the trial has the power to determine guilt or innocence and the penalty to be imposed. The key difference between the two is the severity of the prosecution and the punishment that follows. A court-martial deals with more serious offenses and carries with it the potential for more serious punishments, while a summary court-martial deals with less serious offenses and carries with it the potential for less severe punishments.

Related FAQs

What is an Article 32 hearing?
What is a military judge?
What is the Military Rules of Evidence (MRE) 603?
What is the role of a military prosecutor?
What is the purpose of a military court-martial?
What is the difference between a summary court-martial and a special court-martial?
What rights do service members have under military law?
What is the Military Rules of Evidence (MRE) 608?
What is the UCMJ Article 134?
What is the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 99?

What is the difference between a court martial and a summary court-martial?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts