What is the difference between a general court-martial and a special court-martial?

The difference between a general court-martial and a special court-martial is their jurisdiction and authority. A general court-martial is the highest level of military court and has the most authority. It is composed of a minimum of five members and is presided over by a military judge. It has the power to try any offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and impose any sentence including the death penalty. A special court-martial is the lowest level of military court and has limited jurisdiction. It is composed of three to five members and is presided over by a military judge advocate. It has the power to try offenses under the UCMJ and to impose sentences including a maximum of one year confinement, reduction in rank and pay, and a dishonorable discharge. In Tennessee, the jurisdiction of a general court martial and a special court-martial is established by state law and federal regulations. Special court-martial have jurisdiction over offenses that are not punishable by death in Tennessee. General court-martials have the power to try any offense under the UCMJ and impose any sentence including the death penalty.

Related FAQs

Who has the authority to convene a court-martial?
What is the UCMJ Article 134a?
What are the rights of an accused in a court-martial?
What is the Military Rules of Evidence (MRE)?
What is the UCMJ Article 120?
What is the UCMJ Article 134?
What is a military jury?
What is the purpose of a military investigative hearing?
What is a post-trial review article in a court-martial?
What is the role of an Air Force JAG lawyer?

Related Blog Posts

Military Law – What You Need to Know - July 31, 2023
Understanding the Different Types of Military Law - August 7, 2023
Navigating Military Courts and Procedures - August 14, 2023
A Guide to Military Service Member Rights - August 21, 2023
Understanding Military Court Martial Laws - August 28, 2023