Are negligent security cases difficult to win?

Negligent security cases can be difficult to win, particularly if they are in Washington. The legal standard is often quite high in these cases and the court may require that the plaintiff prove that the property owner knew or should have known about the risk of criminal activity. The plaintiff must also prove that the property owner created an unreasonable risk by failing to provide adequate security, and that the criminal activity that took place was foreseeable. Furthermore, Washington law states that a property owner is not liable for criminal acts committed by third parties on their property. Thus, even if the plaintiff can prove all of the other elements of their case, it can still be difficult to win the case if the property owner can show that they did not have actual knowledge of the risk of criminal activity. All of these elements must be proven in order for a plaintiff to be successful in a negligent security case in Washington.

Related FAQs

What kind of financial damages can I seek in a negligent security case?
What are the legal rights of a negligent security victim?
What kind of protection is provided by security guards?
How do I find an experienced negligent security attorney?
What types of negligent security cases can be taken to trial?
What are the common elements of a negligent security claim?
What are basic premises liability rules?
How can I find an experienced negligent security attorney?
Are negligent security cases difficult to win?
What happens when a business is found liable for negligent security?

Are negligent security cases difficult to win?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts