Are there any restrictions on the types of damages that can be awarded in a product liability case?

Yes, there are restrictions on the types of damages that can be awarded in a product liability case in Washington state. Generally speaking, the only damages that may be awarded in a product liability case are those that compensate a plaintiff for losses that have been caused by a product defect. These damages may include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and emotional distress. In some cases, punitive damages may also be awarded if the defendant was particularly reckless or showed intentional disregard for the safety of others. Washington also has several laws that put restrictions on damages for defective products that are sold with a written warranty and for products owned by the state or a governmental agency. In cases of products with a written warranty, damages may be limited to replacement of the product or repair of the product, and may not include any punitive or emotional distress damages. In cases of products owned by the state or governmental agency, the damages may be limited to the amount paid for the product, and may not include any punitive or emotional distress damages. So, while there are restrictions on the types of damages that may be awarded in a product liability case in Washington state, plaintiffs are still able to seek compensation for their losses caused by defective products.

Related FAQs

What are the damages that a plaintiff can recover in a product liability case?
How do juries decide product liability cases?
What is the economic loss doctrine?
What is the difference between negligence and strict liability in product liability law?
What are the differences between a design defect, manufacturing defect, and warning defect claim?
How does a plaintiff prove causation in a design defect claim?
How does product liability law apply to products that are used for commercial purposes?
What is the “state of the art” defense?
What is the legal standard for determining if a product is “unreasonably dangerous”?
What is the legal standard for determining whether a product is dangerous or defective?

Are there any restrictions on the types of damages that can be awarded in a product liability case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts