What is the legal standard for determining if a product is “unreasonably dangerous”?

In Washington, the legal standard for determining if a product is “unreasonably dangerous” is set by the Washington Product Liability Act. According to this Act, a product is considered to be “unreasonably dangerous” when it contains a defect that has not been corrected and it is not used as intended, and the defect is a cause of injury. The defect must be such that a reasonable person would not expect it to exist when taking into account the nature of the product and the intended use. It must also be the case that the product cannot be made safe with reasonable care. If a product is found to be “unreasonably dangerous”, then the manufacturer of the product can be held liable for any injuries that were caused by the defective product. In order to determine if a product is unreasonably dangerous, the court will consider a number of factors, such as the product’s design and instructions for use, any warnings or safety instructions, the product’s age, and the product’s use at the time of the injury. It is important to note that the legal standard for determining if a product is “unreasonably dangerous” may vary from state to state.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between negligence and strict liability in product liability law?
Are products with “open and obvious” defects liable?
What type of damages can a plaintiff recover in a product liability case?
What is the “consumer expectation test”?
What type of damages can be recovered from a product liability lawsuit?
What is the legal standard for determining if a product is “unreasonably dangerous”?
What is the legal definition of a defective product?
Does a plaintiff need to prove negligence in a product liability claim?
What are some common defenses used by defendants in product liability cases?
What are the components of a successful product liability claim?

What is the legal standard for determining if a product is “unreasonably dangerous”?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts