What are the legal implications of assisted reproductive technology and welfare of the child?

In Virginia, the implications of assisted reproductive technology (ART) on the welfare of the child are complex. The Commonwealth of Virginia does not have a comprehensive law on the use of ART, so the legal implications depend on the type of ART being used. For example, if a couple choose to use a donor egg or sperm, Virginia law requires them to have a valid and enforceable written agreement regarding child support, health insurance, and educational expenses. The Commonwealth does, however, have laws for couples seeking to use a surrogate mother. Under Virginia law, the intended parents of a child born using a surrogate must establish and legally recognize the parent-child relationship by obtaining a court order. This order must include the signatures of the surrogate and intended parents, as well as a statement of the intended parents’ intent to raise the child as their own. Additionally, Virginia permits pre-birth orders, which allow the intended parents to be named on the birth certificate of the child born via surrogate. Such orders must be issued in the county or city where the intended parents reside. The welfare of the child is of utmost importance in Virginia. To protect the child’s interests, Virginia has criminal laws punishing those who breach surrogacy agreements and fail to fulfill their child support obligations. Additionally, Virginia laws also require that the best interests of the child be considered in any custody disputes that may arise. Overall, the legal implications of assisted reproductive technology on the welfare of the child depend on the specific ART used and the agreements made between the parties involved.

What are the legal implications of assisted reproductive technology and welfare of the child?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts