How does the evidence presented in a small claims court hearing differ from that presented in other courts?

In South Carolina, evidence presented in a small claims court hearing is different from that presented in other courts because of the simpler proceedings and minimal documentation requirements. Small claims court is an efficient way to resolve disputes without much paperwork or legal fees. Typically, arbitration or mediation is not available in small claims court and most cases are handled by the presiding judge or magistrate. In a small claims court hearing, the evidence presented is more informal and fewer rules apply. Witnesses are not required to testify under oath since the proceedings are not considered a trial. Documentary evidence is also accepted such as contracts, invoices, and receipts. This type of evidence is simpler and easier to interpret than other forms of evidence that might be presented in other courts. However, it is important to note that evidence presented must still be relevant to the case and may not be used in a way that prejudices the court. In comparison to other types of courts, the evidence presented in small claims court is much less extensive and the rules for admissibility may be more flexible. Additionally, witnesses and parties may be called to provide evidence in person, by mail, or through affidavits. The judge may also consider the statement of the parties and the evidence they provide before making a decision. Ultimately, the decision rests with the judge and their assessment of the evidence presented.

How does the evidence presented in a small claims court hearing differ from that presented in other courts?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts