What is the difference between a motion for judgment and a motion for new trial in small claims court?

A motion for judgment and a motion for a new trial are two different motions that can be filed in Rhode Island’s small claims court. A motion for judgment is a request that a judge enter judgment on a case without a trial. The motion includes the facts and legal argument being presented. The other party then has two weeks to file a written response to the motion. The judge will review the facts and make a decision without holding a trial. On the other hand, a motion for a new trial is a request for a new trial based on some mistake or irregularity that occurred during the original trial. This could include inadequate representation, new evidence that was not available at the time of the trial, the judge making a mistake in the law, or any other fact that the party believes warrants a new trial. The motion must be based on clear and convincing evidence. In sum, a motion for judgment is a request for a decision without a trial, while a motion for a new trial is a request for the case to be tried again based on some mistake or irregularity. Both can be filed in Rhode Island’s small claims court.

Related FAQs

Can I request a jury trial in a small claims court case?
How do I know if my case is eligible for small claims court?
When is the plaintiff's evidence due in a small claims court hearing?
How do I file an answer to a complaint filed in small claims court?
What happens if I am unable to pay a small claims court judgment?
Can I request a change of venue in a small claims court case?
How do I go about representing myself in small claims court?
Can I introduce new evidence in a small claims court hearing after it has started?
Is there a limit on the amount of damages that can be recovered in a small claims court case?
What types of disputes are eligible for small claims court?

What is the difference between a motion for judgment and a motion for new trial in small claims court?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts