What is the difference between a motion for judgment and a motion for new trial in small claims court?

A motion for judgment and a motion for new trial are two different things in small claims court in Wisconsin. A motion for judgment is when one of the parties wants the court to make a final decision on a claim. The motion must be made after all the evidence has been presented. The motion asks the court to decide the case, ruling on the claims and counter-claims that the parties presented during the trial. A motion for a new trial is when one of the parties wants to have a new trial, usually because they believe that there was an error in the trial that could have affected the outcome of the case. This motion must be made before the court renders its decision and must be supported by evidence of an error or another reason that would justify a new trial. In short, a motion for judgment is when a party asks the court to decide the case based on the existing evidence, while a motion for a new trial is when a party requests a do-over due to an error or an unforeseen event that the court should consider.

Related FAQs

How do I file a motion to have a case heard in small claims court?
What is small claims court?
Is there a limit on the number of claims I can file in small claims court?
What is the process for appealing a small claims court decision?
How do I collect a small claims court judgment from a business?
Can I appeal a ruling of a small claims court judge?
What is the process for objecting to evidence in a small claims court case?
How much time do I have to file an appeal in a small claims court case?
What is the process for requesting a court trial in a small claims court case?
Are there any limits on the amount of damages I can be awarded in a small claims court case?

What is the difference between a motion for judgment and a motion for new trial in small claims court?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts