Can I introduce new evidence in a small claims court hearing after it has started?

Yes, it is possible to introduce new evidence in a small claims court hearing in Maryland after it has started. This is done by filing a motion for reconsideration with the court. The motion should explain why the evidence was not presented during the original hearing. For example, if the evidence was not available until after the hearing concluded, this should be stated in the motion. The other party must be given notice of the motion for reconsideration and must be allowed to respond. The judge has the discretion to decide whether or not to grant the motion depending on the circumstances. If the motion is approved, the judge will then review the evidence and render a decision on the case. The small claims court in Maryland encourages parties to make every effort to present all of their evidence at the initial hearing in order to avoid the need to file a motion for reconsideration. If the new evidence is critical to the case and could affect the outcome, then the parties should take the necessary steps to introduce it before the conclusion of the hearing.

Related FAQs

Are there any special rules for parties under the age of 18 in small claims court?
What is the procedure for submitting evidence to the court in a small claims case?
How do I file an answer to a complaint filed in small claims court?
What is the process for objecting to evidence in a small claims court case?
Can I have a jury trial in a small claims court case?
What is the process for obtaining a garnishment order in a small claims court case?
What is the process for appealing a small claims court decision?
What happens if I disagree with the decision in a small claims court case?
What can I do if the other party fails to appear in small claims court?
How do I file a claim in small claims court?

Can I introduce new evidence in a small claims court hearing after it has started?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts