What is the “burden of proof” in sports injury cases?

The “burden of proof” in sports injury cases refers to the responsibility of the plaintiff to provide enough evidence to prove their case to the court. In Washington, this burden of proof is known as the “preponderance of the evidence”, meaning that the plaintiff must present enough evidence to make it more likely than not that they are correct. In other words, they must prove that it is more likely than not that the defendant was negligent in their actions and that this negligence resulted in the injury sustained. Various types of evidence could be used to demonstrate the plaintiff’s case in a court of law. This could include documentary evidence in the form of photographs or medical records, or even witness testimony from other players or spectators who saw the incident. It is important to note that the plaintiff is not required to provide irrefutable proof, but only enough evidence to make it more likely than not that their case is correct. In Washington, the plaintiff carries the burden of proof in sports injury cases. In other words, it is their responsibility to provide the evidence that proves their case. The defendant is not required to provide evidence to disprove the plaintiff’s claim, but they do have the ability to present their own evidence to contest it. If the plaintiff is able to provide a preponderance of evidence to support their claim, the court can then decide in their favor and the defendant will be held liable for their actions.

What is the “burden of proof” in sports injury cases?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts