How is liability determined in a tire failure lawsuit?

In California, liability in a tire failure lawsuit is determined based on a variety of factors and it ultimately depends on the specific facts of each case. Generally speaking, when determining liability in a tire failure lawsuit, the court will look at the age of the tire and the care taken by the owner in its maintenance. The court will ask if the tire was purchased new or used and if it had been regularly serviced according to the manufacturer’s instructions. If the tire was well taken care of, but still failed due to manufacturer defect, then the manufacturer may be held liable. Additionally, if the owner purchased used tires that weren’t adequately inspected prior to purchase, he or she may also be held liable. The court will also consider the cause of the tire failure. Was it a blowout due to acceleration and wheel spin, or was it caused by a nail puncture, or something else? If the failure was a result of a defective tire, then the manufacturer can be held accountable for any resulting damages. Ultimately, the court will take into account all of the specifics of each case to determine who is liable.

Related FAQs

What evidence is required to prove a tire failure claim?
What are the possible outcomes of a tire failure lawsuit?
What types of tire failure are covered under tire failure law?
What is the procedure for filing a tire failure claim?
Is the vehicle manufacturer liable in a tire failure lawsuit?
What kind of evidence will I need to prove tire failure?
Are tire tread depth and tire pressure related to tire failure?
What does tire failure law cover?
What is tire failure law?
What are the legal options if I am injured due to a tire failure?

How is liability determined in a tire failure lawsuit?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts