What is the difference between an intent to use application and an actual use application?

The difference between an intent to use application and an actual use application in Indiana is important to understand. Intent to use applications are used when the business intends to use the trademark in the future, but has not used it yet. An actual use application is used when the business has already started using the trademark. An intent to use application does not require proof of the trademark actually being used in commerce. It is used to reserve the right to use the trademark in the future. Usually, when a business applies for an intent to use, it is working towards being able to use the trademark in commerce. An actual use application, on the other hand, requires that the trademark has already been in use. The business must have used the trademark in the course of business in Indiana. Any submitted evidence that proves the use of the trademark must show that the trademark is in use in the state. Knowing the difference between an intent to use application and an actual use application is important because the trademark application process can be confusing. Understanding the requirements in Indiana can help businesses understand what application to use in order to secure their trademark.

Related FAQs

How do I obtain a federal trademark registration?
What is a trademark infringement lawsuit and how do I file one?
How much does it cost to defend a trademark?
What happens if two companies have the same trademark?
Can I register my trademark internationally without the help of a trademark attorney?
How can I protect my trademark from counterfeiters?
Can I license my trademark to another company?
What is the trademark registration process?
Can another person use my trademark without permission?
Can I register a trademark internationally?

What is the difference between an intent to use application and an actual use application?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts