How has the Supreme Court interpreted the Ninth Amendment of the US Constitution?

The Ninth Amendment of the US Constitution states that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution does not deny or disparage other rights retained by the people. Over the years, the US Supreme Court has interpreted this amendment in various ways. In Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court held that the Ninth Amendment along with the Bill of Rights creates a “zone of privacy” that protects certain areas of people’s personal lives from government intrusion. This ruling established that the Ninth Amendment protects unenumerated rights such as the right to privacy. In Roe v. Wade (1973), the Supreme Court further expanded the reach of the Ninth Amendment by finding that a woman’s right to seek an abortion was a fundamental right protected by the Ninth Amendment. The Court held that the explicit rights listed in the Constitution, along with the Ninth Amendment, established the “right of personal privacy” that includes the right to an abortion. In Lawrence v. Texas (2003), the Supreme Court applied the Ninth Amendment in the context of anti-sodomy laws. The Court struck down the Texas law that criminalized same-sex intimate relations. The Court held that the Ninth Amendment creates a “residual right of privacy” and that the Texas law violated that right. Overall, the US Supreme Court has interpreted the Ninth Amendment of the US Constitution to protect a broad range of unenumerated rights, including the right to privacy, the right to seek an abortion and the right to engage in intimate relations. These rulings have had a significant impact on the state of Louisiana, as well as the rest of the nation.

How has the Supreme Court interpreted the Ninth Amendment of the US Constitution?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts