What is the difference between a plea bargain and a plea of nolo contendere?

A plea bargain and a plea of nolo contendere are two types of pleas a defendant can make when charged with a white collar crime in Tennessee. A plea bargain is an agreement made between the defendant and the prosecuting attorney in which the defendant agrees to plead guilty to the crime in exchange for a lesser sentence than would have been imposed if the case had gone to trial. The plea bargain also allows the defendant to avoid a potentially long and costly trial. A plea of nolo contendere, commonly referred to as a “no contest” plea, is a legal plea in which the defendant does not admit guilt, but still agrees to accept a punishment. In the case of a white collar crime in Tennessee, a plea of nolo contendere gives the defendant the option of avoiding a trial and accepting responsibility for the crime without actually admitting guilt. The primary difference between a plea bargain and a plea of nolo contendere lies in the level of responsibility that the defendant is taking for the crime. With a plea bargain, the defendant is admitting guilt and agreeing to accept the sentence in exchange for avoiding a trial, while with a plea of nolo contendere, the defendant is not necessarily admitting guilt, but is instead accepting a sentence without admitting responsibility for the crime.

Related FAQs

How is corruption of public office committed?
How is securities fraud committed?
How is a criminal court different from a civil court?
What is the difference between a statutory and common law crime?
What are the consequences for computer fraud?
What are the penalties for white collar crime?
What is insider trading?
How is wire fraud committed?
What are the defenses to white collar crime?
What are the penalties for foreclosure fraud?

What is the difference between a plea bargain and a plea of nolo contendere?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts