What is administrative adjudication?

Administrative adjudication is a process that allows a governmental agency to resolve disputes and impose penalties. In California, administrative adjudication is used to resolve disputes between the public and state administrative agencies. This process allows individuals to challenge state agencies’ decisions without going through the court system. In an administrative adjudication, the agency holds a hearing and listens to both parties involved in the dispute. The agency legally represents itself as a neutral decision maker and all parties involved in the dispute are allowed to present evidence, witnesses, and arguments in support of their position. The agency, or adjudicator, then considers the evidence and arguments both parties have presented and makes a decision based on the facts of the dispute. Administrative adjudication can be used to resolve disputes between an agency and individual or two individuals. The decision of the adjudicator has the same legal effect as if had been made by a court, and is subject to judicial review. In addition, administrative adjudication is often faster and less expensive than court proceedings, allowing disputes to be resolved quickly and efficiently.

Related FAQs

What is the process of rulemaking?
What are the differences between administrative actions and civil actions?
What is the nature of deference shown to administrative decisions?
What is the role of statutory interpretation in administrative law?
What is the purpose of the Administrative Procedure Act and what are its basic requirements?
What are the main sources of administrative law?
What are the rules of administrative procedure?
What is an administrative rule?
What is the role of administrative remedies?
What are the common procedures used in administrative law?

What is administrative adjudication?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts