What is administrative adjudication?

Administrative adjudication is a process that allows a governmental agency to resolve disputes and impose penalties. In California, administrative adjudication is used to resolve disputes between the public and state administrative agencies. This process allows individuals to challenge state agencies’ decisions without going through the court system. In an administrative adjudication, the agency holds a hearing and listens to both parties involved in the dispute. The agency legally represents itself as a neutral decision maker and all parties involved in the dispute are allowed to present evidence, witnesses, and arguments in support of their position. The agency, or adjudicator, then considers the evidence and arguments both parties have presented and makes a decision based on the facts of the dispute. Administrative adjudication can be used to resolve disputes between an agency and individual or two individuals. The decision of the adjudicator has the same legal effect as if had been made by a court, and is subject to judicial review. In addition, administrative adjudication is often faster and less expensive than court proceedings, allowing disputes to be resolved quickly and efficiently.

Related FAQs

What are the limits of administrative powers?
What are the roles and responsibilities of administrative agencies?
What is the role of the Administrative Conference of the United States in administrative law?
What is the role of judicial review of administrative actions?
What is the purpose of the Administrative Process Act?
How does administrative law differ from private law?
What is the purpose of administrative sanctions?
What is the role of the Administrative Law Judge in an administrative proceeding?
What are the different types of administrative actions?
What is the role of special interest groups in administrative law?

What is administrative adjudication?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts