What types of cases are not suitable for arbitration?

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Law is a form of legal dispute resolution that takes place outside the court system in Alaska. ADR is an effective way to reach a resolution that is agreeable to both parties, while avoiding costly legal fees and lengthy court proceedings. Although arbitration is the most common type of ADR, not all cases are suitable for arbitration. Cases involving criminal law, family law, or child support/custody cannot go through arbitration. This is because these matters require judicial input in order to be properly resolved, and arbitration does not provide that level of depth and oversight. Additionally, cases involving a significant amount of money or assets may not be suitable for arbitration. This is because the arbitration process is typically less formal than the court system, meaning the rules and regulations that govern investigative authority are not as strict. As a result, it may not be possible to adequately evaluate the full financial situation of the parties. Finally, certain disputes, such as those involving public policy issues, are not suitable for arbitration. This is because a decision made in an arbitration cannot be appealed to the court system and therefore cannot set a legal precedent. This means that the decision of the arbitration panel would not be binding in future cases. In conclusion, arbitration is a viable option to settle most disputes, but there are certain types of cases that may not be suitable for arbitration. These include cases involving criminal law, family law, child support/custody, a significant amount of money or assets, and public policy disputes.

What types of cases are not suitable for arbitration?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts