What is the difference between equitable relief and legal relief?

In Oklahoma, there are two types of relief available when seeking a remedy for an injury or other legal wrong: equitable relief and legal relief. Equitable relief is relief granted where there is no available legal remedy, such as an injunction to prevent a particular act or a court order that orders a party to do something. Legal relief, on the other hand, is relief given by the court based on a legal right or cause of action. This type of relief is usually a monetary award to compensate for a legal wrong or to put the aggrieved party in the same position as before the injury occurred. The main difference between equitable relief and legal relief is that equitable relief is determined by the court’s discretion and based on the facts of the case. There are no fixed rules for the court to follow in granting equitable relief, so the court has the power to decide what is fair and just in each particular situation. Legal relief, on the other hand, is determined by the law and can often be limited to specific types of damages. In Oklahoma, the court may grant both equitable relief and legal relief when appropriate. The relief granted will depend on the facts at hand and the court’s discretion. Ultimately, the goal of either type of relief is to remedy the wrong and fairly compensate the wronged party.

Related FAQs

What is a motion for contempt in civil law?
What is a motion to quash in civil law?
What is a garnishment in civil law?
What is an interpleader in civil law?
What are the differences between civil law and other areas of law?
What is the role of a mediator in civil law?
What is an appeal in civil law?
What is a counterclaim in civil law?
What is a plea agreement in civil law?
What is the difference between a jury trial and a bench trial?

What is the difference between equitable relief and legal relief?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts