What is the difference between arbitration and civil litigation?

Arbitration and civil litigation are two distinct processes for resolving disputes. They differ in many aspects, such as the behavior, roles, and authority of the arbitrator or judge during the proceedings. In civil litigation, a dispute is adjudicated by a judge in a court of law, and the decision is binding on the parties. The judge or jury is responsible for determining the facts of the case and making a ruling or judgment in favor of one party or the other. The ruling or judgment can be in the form of a monetary award or an injunction ordering a party to take or refrain from taking a specific action. The parties involved have limited control and input in the outcome of the civil litigation. Arbitration, on the other hand, is an alternative dispute resolution process. It takes place outside of the court system with a third-party neutral deciding the outcome of a dispute. The arbitrator is selected by the parties involved, and their ruling is also binding. Unlike civil litigation, arbitration gives parties more control over the outcome, as they are able to choose the arbitrator, agree on the scope and rules of the arbitration, and have a say in the final decision. Overall, the main difference between arbitration and civil litigation is that civil litigation is conducted in a court of law while arbitration is conducted outside of the court system with a neutral third-party making the final decision.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between arbitration and civil litigation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts