What is a motion for judgment as a matter of law in civil litigation?

A motion for judgment as a matter of law in civil litigation is a request to the court to find that the opposition has failed to meet their burden of proof in a case. It is usually filed by the defendant after the plaintiff has presented their evidence during a trial or hearing. In Arizona, a motion for judgment as a matter of law is governed by Rule 50 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. This rule outlines the procedures for making the motion and when it may be granted. To grant the motion, the court must find that the evidence presented by the plaintiff is insufficient to sustain a legally reasonable jury verdict. When a motion for judgment as a matter of of law is granted, the defendant will win the case without the jury having to decide the case. In some cases, a judge may grant the motion after the jury has reached its verdict, in which case the judge overrules the jury. Motions for judgment as a matter of law are commonly used in civil litigation in Arizona, although they are rarely granted. This is because these motions are difficult to win and require extensive legal knowledge to successfully argue.

Related FAQs

What are the limits of attorney fees in civil litigation?
What is the discovery process in civil litigation?
What is the law of res ipsa loquitur in civil litigation?
What is a motion to compel discovery in civil litigation?
What is a motion for default in civil litigation?
What are the deadlines and requirements for civil litigation?
Who represents the parties in civil litigation?
What are the elements of a prima facie case in civil litigation?
What is the purpose of civil litigation law?
What is an interlocutory injunction in civil litigation?

What is a motion for judgment as a matter of law in civil litigation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts