What is the difference between trial and appellate court in civil litigation?

The differences between trial and appellate courts in California civil litigation are mainly based on the purpose of the court and the types of cases each court handles. Trial courts are the first level of court for parties who are involved in civil litigation. These courts hold full trials and hear evidence and testimony regarding the case. Decisions from trial courts can be reviewed by appellate courts. Appellate courts are higher levels of courts in the judicial system. These courts cannot hold trials and cannot hear evidence or testimony. Rather, they review decisions made by trial courts. These courts are primarily used in order to ensure that lower courts handle cases according to the law. These courts may also be used to decide on issues related to questions of law, rather than disputes about the facts. In summary, the main difference between trial and appellate court in California civil litigation is that trial courts hear evidence and testimony during a trial, while appellate courts review decisions made by trial courts to ensure that the law is being followed. Appellate courts are also used to decide on issues related to questions of law.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between trial and appellate court in civil litigation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts