What is the difference between breach of contract and a tort?

A breach of contract and a tort are both legal wrongs, but they are different from one another. Breach of contract is a violation of a legally binding agreement between two or more parties. This means one of the parties did not fulfill their part of the contract, or did not fulfill it in a specified way. For example, a contractor might fail to complete a project by the agreed-upon date, or provide a substandard product. In contrast, a tort is a civil wrong other than breach of contract, such as an intentional physical injury or damage to property. In Virginia, a tort can involve negligence, which is when one party has a duty of care to another, but fails to display that care and causes harm as a result. For example, if a driver was texting while driving and caused an accident, they could be liable for the damages caused. In summary, a breach of contract is the violation of an agreement made between two or more parties, while a tort involves civil wrongs, such as negligence or intentional physical injury or damage to property.

Related FAQs

What is the role of the Law of Property Act?
What is the role of the Competition and Markets Authority?
What are the regulations governing the formation of companies?
What is the difference between a share and a bond?
What is the purpose of the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act?
What is the difference between a breach of contract and a tort?
What are the different types of corporate liability?
What is the difference between an employee and a contractor?
What legislation governs the advertising of products and services?
What is the role of the court in enforcing commercial contracts?

What is the difference between breach of contract and a tort?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts