What is the difference between breach of contract and a tort?

A breach of contract and a tort are both legal wrongs, but they are different from one another. Breach of contract is a violation of a legally binding agreement between two or more parties. This means one of the parties did not fulfill their part of the contract, or did not fulfill it in a specified way. For example, a contractor might fail to complete a project by the agreed-upon date, or provide a substandard product. In contrast, a tort is a civil wrong other than breach of contract, such as an intentional physical injury or damage to property. In Virginia, a tort can involve negligence, which is when one party has a duty of care to another, but fails to display that care and causes harm as a result. For example, if a driver was texting while driving and caused an accident, they could be liable for the damages caused. In summary, a breach of contract is the violation of an agreement made between two or more parties, while a tort involves civil wrongs, such as negligence or intentional physical injury or damage to property.

Related FAQs

What is the procedure for resolving commercial disputes?
What are the rules for issuing securities?
What is the procedure for bringing a claim for misappropriation of intellectual property?
What are the rules surrounding the transfer of ownership of a business?
What is the difference between an employee and a contractor?
What is the process for winding up a company voluntarily?
How does the law protect minority shareholders?
What is the process for collecting unpaid debts?
What is the function of a company secretary?
How do I protect my business from fraud?

What is the difference between breach of contract and a tort?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts