What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

In Washington, direct and indirect concurrent sentences are both types of sentences that can be imposed after someone has been convicted of a crime. The difference is in the timing of their implementation. A direct concurrent sentence is when all parts of the sentence occur and are completed simultaneously. For example, if someone is found guilty of a crime and is sentenced to one year in prison and fined $2,000, the direct concurrent sentence would be the one year in prison and the $2,000 fine, both of which would be imposed at the same time. An indirect concurrent sentence is when two or more sentences are imposed on the same day, but one of the sentences is made to start at a later date. For example, if someone is found guilty of a crime and is sentenced to one year in prison and ordered to pay a $2,000 fine at a later date, the indirect concurrent sentence would be the one year in prison, which would begin immediately, plus the $2,000 fine, which would only be due at a later date. In Washington, the decision to impose a direct or indirect concurrent sentence is ultimately up to the judge who hears the case. Depending on the nature and severity of the crime, a judge may opt for one sentence type or the other, or even a combination of them.

Related FAQs

What is the role of the prosecution in a criminal case?
What is the impact of the Bill of Rights on criminal law?
What is the authority of a police officer in criminal cases?
What is sentencing in criminal cases?
What is the purpose of a criminal trial?
What is the purpose of a grand jury indictment?
What is a motion to suppress in criminal procedure?
What is the purpose of a criminal defense lawyer?
What is the difference between criminal and civil law?
What is the process of a jury trial in criminal cases?

What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts