What is the difference between a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment?

A settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment are two legal procedures used in civil procedure in Indiana. Settlement conferences are used when parties involved in a civil lawsuit wish to come to an agreement without having to go to trial. The conference is held between the two parties, and their lawyers, and is mediated by a Judge. The purpose is to reach an agreement that is mutually beneficial and satisfactory to both parties. A motion for summary judgment is a procedure used at the trial level to request that the case be decided without a trial and that judgment be entered in favor of one of the parties. This type of motion is often used when the facts of the case are not being contested and all parties agree on the outcome. A motion for summary judgment can be filed by either the plaintiff or the defendant and is decided by the court. In summary, the difference between a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment is that a settlement conference is used to attempt to reach an agreement outside of court, while a motion for summary judgment is used to present a request to the court that the case be decided without a trial and judgment be entered in favor of one of the parties. Both of these procedures are used in civil procedure in Indiana.

Related FAQs

What is a motion for a permanent injunction?
What is a settlement conference?
What are the remedies for discovery violations?
What are the rules for amending pleadings?
What is the role of a judge in a civil case?
What is a cross-complaint?
What are the rules and procedures for a change of venue?
What is the difference between a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment?
What is a motion to compel or enforce discovery?
What is a motion to quash a subpoena?

What is the difference between a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts