What are the differences between civil law and common law in international litigation?

There are several key differences between civil law and common law in international litigation. Civil law is based on a set of codified laws which are created and enforced by the government. This legal system is often used in countries such as France, Spain, and Russia. Civil law is based on the legal principles of justice, equity, and fairness. It is composed of general laws that dictate rules and regulations on how individuals interact with each other, rather than on precedent or custom. Common law, on the other hand, is based on the court decisions made in specific cases and is used in countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States. Its focus is on the precedents set by the court decisions, rather than on the codified laws. Common law systems view legal rulings as binding, meaning that they are applicable to similar cases that may arise in the future. In Alaska, international litigation is based on both civil and common law depending on the scope and type of the case. However, one of the major differences between these two legal systems is that civil law is based on the rule of law, whereas common law is based on the doctrine of precedent. This means that in civil law systems, the court is bound to follow the principles and rules of law as set by the government, while in common law systems, the court is free to interpret the law and create its own precedents.

Related FAQs

What are the differences between civil law and common law in international litigation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts