What is the difference between diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality?

Diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality are two concepts in international law that are often confused. Diplomatic immunity is the concept that foreign diplomatic representatives are immune from the jurisdiction of the host country. This means that diplomats are not subject to arrest, detention, or prosecution by the courts of the host country and cannot be sued in its courts. Extraterritoriality, on the other hand, is the concept that a person’s home country’s laws are applicable in the host country. This means that citizens of the sending state, who are in the host state, may be subject to the laws of their home state rather than the laws of the host state. In Oregon, this usually applies to military personnel who are in the state on official orders. In summary, diplomatic immunity means that foreign diplomats in Oregon are exempt from the host country’s jurisdiction, while extraterritoriality means that citizens of the sending state may be subject to their home country’s laws in the host state.

Related FAQs

What is the International Criminal Court (ICC)?
What are the international regulations on intellectual property rights?
What are the international norms on armed conflict?
What is the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment (CPED)?
What is the International Law of Humanitarian Intervention?
What is the International Labour Organization (ILO)?
What is the International Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CG)?
What is the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (CPED)?
What is the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)?
What are the international regimes on trafficking in persons and drugs?

What is the difference between diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts