What are some common defenses used in maritime personal injury cases?

In maritime personal injury cases in California, there are a variety of defenses that may be used. The most common defenses are contributory negligence, assumption of risk, and unseaworthiness. Contributory negligence is when the plaintiff is seen to have contributed to their own injury. This could include disregarding safety warnings, failing to take reasonable precautions, or behaving recklessly. Assumption of risk is when the plaintiff was aware of the risks involved in the activity and voluntarily accepted those risks. This could include taking part in a hazardous activity or not following safety measures. Unseaworthiness is when the ship or vessel was not fit for its intended use at the time of the injury. This could include inadequate safety equipment, improper maintenance, or insufficient crew. These are some of the most common defenses used in maritime personal injury cases in California. There may be other defenses that are applicable to particular cases as well. An experienced lawyer will be able to evaluate the merits of any defense and provide counsel on the best course of action.

Related FAQs

What if my employer is located in a different state than where I was injured?
What should I do if my employer does not comply with safety regulations?
What if I am injured as a result of an explosion at sea?
What happens if I cannot make it to court due to an injury at sea?
What if I am injured while working on an offshore oil platform?
What types of medical expenses are covered after a maritime injury?
How does the ‘Saving to Suitors’ clause affect maritime claims?
What compensation can I receive for a wrongful death at sea?
What if I am injured due to the negligence of a third party?
What kind of evidence do I need to prove negligence in a maritime injury case?

What are some common defenses used in maritime personal injury cases?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts