What is the difference between a court-martial and a board of inquiry?

A court-martial and a board of inquiry are two separate proceedings used in the military in Washington. A court-martial is a trial conducted by a panel of commissioned officers, which determines the guilt or innocence of a service member accused of a military offense. The court-martial consists of a military judge, a panel of officers, and a defense lawyer. The court-martial process is similar to a civilian criminal trial in that evidence is presented and witnesses are called to testify. The court-martial can impose punishments, including confinement and dismissal from the military, depending on the offense. A board of inquiry is an administrative inquiry that reviews the facts surrounding the circumstances of a service member’s conduct. Unlike a court-martial, a board of inquiry does not involve a determination of guilt or innocence. The board’s job is to evaluate the available evidence and determine whether the service member has engaged in conduct that is contrary to military regulations. The board of inquiry can recommend administrative action, including reprimand or discharge from the military, depending on the circumstances.

Related FAQs

What is a post-trial review article in a court-martial?
What is the difference between a court-martial and a board of inquiry?
What is the Miranda warning in a court-martial?
What are the potential punishments that can be imposed in a court-martial?
What is the UCMJ Article 134a?
What is the rule against hearsay?
What is the maximum punishment for an Article 134 offense?
What is the maximum punishment for an Article 120 offense?
What is the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 107?
How does the Sixth Amendment apply to court-martial proceedings?

What is the difference between a court-martial and a board of inquiry?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts