What is the difference between a medical malpractice claim and a breach of contract claim?

Medical malpractice is an area of law that deals with medical errors or negligence that causes harm to a patient. In contrast, a breach of contract claim is a legal action that occurs when one party fails to fulfill the terms of an agreement or contract with another party. The main difference between a medical malpractice claim and a breach of contract claim is the fact that the former involves a medical professional providing inadequate care to a patient, while the latter is concerned with a party not upholding their end of a contract. In a medical malpractice claim, the patient is trying to recover compensation from the medical professional for any harm or damages caused by the medical professional’s negligence. In contrast, a breach of contract claim seeks to recover damages for any losses suffered due to a party not performing the terms of the agreement. In Virginia, for a medical malpractice claim to be successful, the patient must prove that the medical professional failed to provide an appropriate level of care as per the standard of practice for that particular medical specialty in the state. In addition, the patient must prove that the medical professional’s negligence caused the harm or damage that the patient has suffered. On the other hand, for a breach of contract claim, a party must prove that the other party failed to fulfill the terms of the agreement or contract. In summary, medical malpractice and breach of contract claims are two different types of legal claims with different standards of proof required to win a case. Medical malpractice claims require patients to prove negligence and causation, while breach of contract claims must prove that a party failed to fulfill the terms of an agreement.

What is the difference between a medical malpractice claim and a breach of contract claim?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts