What is the difference between a claim of vicarious liability and a claim of professional negligence?

The main difference between a claim of vicarious liability and a claim of professional negligence is the type of liability that each imposes on a person or entity. Vicarious liability is when an employer, or a person in a supervisory role, is held responsible for the negligent or wrongful actions of their employee. Professional negligence, on the other hand, is when an individual suffers a loss as a result of a professional’s failure to meet the accepted standards of their profession. In North Carolina, in a claim of vicarious liability, the employer can be held liable for the wrongdoings of their employee, regardless of whether or not the employer had any knowledge of the employee’s actions. This is because North Carolina has a strict liability standard. However, in a claim of professional negligence, the professional may be liable for economic and non-economic damages if they do not meet the standards of their profession. For example, a nurse in North Carolina is found to have made a mistake in administering medication to a patient. The patient then sues the hospital, claiming vicarious liability. In this case, the hospital is liable, as it is responsible for hiring and training the nurse. If the patient were to sue the nurse for professional negligence, the nurse would be liable for any damages suffered by the patient as a result of failing to meet the standard of care of a nurse. In short, vicarious liability holds an employer liable for the actions of their employee, while professional negligence holds a professional liable for failing to meet the expected standard of their profession.

What is the difference between a claim of vicarious liability and a claim of professional negligence?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts