What is the difference between mandatory and discretionary sentencing?

Mandatory sentencing involves a judge imposing a minimum sentence, or “mandatory minimum”, for a crime. This sentence is dictated by law and cannot be changed by the judge. In Virginia, punishments for certain violent offenses such as murder and rape can include life in prison without the possibility of parole. Discretionary sentencing occurs when a judge is allowed to use their judgement in determining the appropriate sentence for a crime. Judges take into account factors such as the seriousness of the offense, the defendant’s criminal history, and mitigating circumstances when making their decision. Virginia does not have many mandatory sentences, so discretionary sentencing is the most common form of sentencing for criminal offenses. The biggest difference between mandatory and discretionary sentencing is the amount of flexibility that the judge has when determining a sentence. With mandatory sentencing, the judge must follow the guidelines set out by law, while with discretionary sentencing they have more freedom to tailor the sentence to the individual circumstances of the case. Ultimately, the goal of both forms of sentencing is to ensure that justice is served.

Related FAQs

What are the elements of a crime?
What are the rules of sentencing in criminal cases?
What are the rights of victims in criminal proceedings?
What is the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment?
What is the purpose of a grand jury indictment?
What are the different types of criminal defenses?
What is the purpose of a criminal investigation?
What are Miranda warnings in criminal procedure?
What are the rules of evidence to be presented in criminal cases?
What is the difference between a prosecution and a defense attorney?

What is the difference between mandatory and discretionary sentencing?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts