What is the difference between mediation and arbitration?

Mediation and arbitration are two different methods of resolving disputes in the civil justice system in Washington. Mediation is a voluntary process in which a neutral third-party mediator helps the parties negotiate a mutually acceptable resolution of the dispute. The mediator does not take sides or decide the outcome, but rather works with the parties to find a resolution that works for both sides. Arbitration, however, involves having a neutral third-party arbitrator make a ruling or decision about the dispute. This ruling or decision is then binding, meaning that the parties are legally required to comply with it. In arbitration, the parties present their evidence and arguments to the arbitrator, who then uses their extensive knowledge of the law and their understanding of the dispute to make a binding ruling. In summary, the main difference between mediation and arbitration is that mediation is a voluntary process where the parties attempt to resolve their dispute themselves with the help of a mediator, while arbitration is a more formal process where a binding ruling is made by an arbitrator based on their understanding of the dispute and the law.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment?
What is a settlement conference?
What is the judgment/verdict stage of civil procedure?
How does civil procedure differ from state to state?
What is the doctrine of res judicata?
What is the difference between a stipulation and an agreement?
What are the remedies for civil actions?
What are the applicable statutes of limitations?
What is the discovery stage of civil procedure?
What are the rules of evidence in civil procedure?

What is the difference between mediation and arbitration?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts