What is the doctrine of res judicata?

The doctrine of res judicata is an important rule of civil procedure in Washington and other states. It prevents parties from having to relitigate claims that have already been adjudicated in a prior court proceeding. Res judicata means “a matter already judged” and is also commonly referred to as “claim preclusion.” In order for the doctrine of res judicata to apply, the prior court must have had jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter. This means the court must have had the authority to hear the case and make a decision about the outcome. The party who brings a claim must also have had an opportunity to present evidence and legal argument. The court must also have issued a judgment on the merits of the case, meaning the court determined the claim by evaluating the applicable law and evidence. The court must also have entered a final judgment, meaning there are no more appeals pending and all rights to appeal have been exhausted. When the doctrine of res judicata applies, it prevents the same parties from bringing the same claims in a subsequent case. The goal is to save time and resources by avoiding prolonged litigation. In other words, when a court has already determined the outcome of a claim, the same parties should not have to explain the same facts and law all over again.

Related FAQs

What are the rules of evidence in civil procedure?
What is a motion in limine?
What is a change of venue?
What is a counterclaim?
What is res judicata and collateral estoppel?
What is the motion stage of civil procedure?
What are the rules and procedures for jury selection?
What is the difference between a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment?
What is the difference between a stipulation and an agreement?
What is the difference between federal and state civil procedure?

What is the doctrine of res judicata?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts