What is the difference between a non-solicitation and an anti-raiding agreement?

The difference between a non-solicitation and an anti-raiding agreement lies in the purpose of each agreement. A non-solicitation agreement is an arrangement between two parties that prohibits one party from attempting to persuade, entice, or solicit another party’s employees from leaving their current position and taking one with the other party. This type of agreement is intended to protect an employer from the potential financial losses associated with losing an employee to a competitor. An anti-raiding agreement, on the other hand, is used to shield a company from its former employees actively poaching their co-workers to join them in their new business venture. Anti-raiding clauses are created to stop former employees from taking advantage of their contact list, knowledge, and relationships with current co-workers to influence them to leave for a new job. Both non-solicitation and anti-raiding agreements are enforceable under Kansas state employment law. Employers should be aware of the potential consequences of violating either agreement and use them judiciously to protect their interests.

Related FAQs

What are the rights of employees under the Immigration Reform and Control Act?
What are the notice requirements for an employer to terminate an employee?
Are employers required to provide health and safety training to employees?
What is the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)?
What is privacy in the workplace?
What are my rights if my employer withholds my final wages?
What is sexual harassment?
What is the occupational safety and health act (OSHA)?
Can an employer refuse to hire an applicant based on his or her age?
What is the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)?

What is the difference between a non-solicitation and an anti-raiding agreement?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts