What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

A direct concurrent sentence is when a court orders the sentences for two or more offenses to be served at the same time. In other words, both sentences are served at the same time, and the defendant spends no additional time in prison beyond the longest sentence imposed. An indirect concurrent sentence is when a court orders sentences to be served in a particular order. In this case, the sentences are also served at the same time, but the defendant has to first serve the longest sentence before serving the other(s). Once the longest sentence is served, the defendant is released, even if their other sentences have not been fully served. In California, the indirect concurrent sentence is usually used to serve multiple prison sentences at the same time. In conclusion, the main difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence is that in the former, the sentences for two or more offenses are served at the same time, while in the latter, the longest sentence has to be served first, before the other(s) are served.

Related FAQs

What are the rights of victims in criminal cases?
What are Miranda warnings in criminal procedure?
What is the purpose of impeachment of a witness in criminal proceedings?
What are the rules of double jeopardy in criminal procedure?
What is the difference between felony and misdemeanor sentencing?
What is a motion to suppress in criminal procedure?
What are the constitutional rights of suspects in criminal cases?
What is the purpose of a criminal trial?
What is the impact of the Bill of Rights on criminal law?
What is the difference between a summary offense and an indictable offense?

What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts