What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

A direct concurrent sentence is when a court orders the sentences for two or more offenses to be served at the same time. In other words, both sentences are served at the same time, and the defendant spends no additional time in prison beyond the longest sentence imposed. An indirect concurrent sentence is when a court orders sentences to be served in a particular order. In this case, the sentences are also served at the same time, but the defendant has to first serve the longest sentence before serving the other(s). Once the longest sentence is served, the defendant is released, even if their other sentences have not been fully served. In California, the indirect concurrent sentence is usually used to serve multiple prison sentences at the same time. In conclusion, the main difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence is that in the former, the sentences for two or more offenses are served at the same time, while in the latter, the longest sentence has to be served first, before the other(s) are served.

Related FAQs

What is a motion to suppress in criminal procedure?
What is a plea bargain in criminal cases?
What are the different stages of criminal procedure?
What is the difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion?
What is the impact of the Fourth Amendment on criminal law?
What are the constitutional rights of an accused person?
What is the authority of a police officer in criminal cases?
What is the purpose of a criminal defense lawyer?
What are the rules for hearsay evidence in criminal trials?
What is the purpose of an appeal in criminal cases?

What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts